Onto-conscience or Primacy of Conscience
Keywords:
Onto-conscience, primacy of conscience, M. Iqbal, M. HeideggerAbstract
This study addresses the critique of the subject-centered paradigm that became prominent in modern philosophy with René Descartes, within the framework of the concepts of “onto-conscience” and the “primacy of conscience.” While subject-centeredness reduces being to the constitutive activity of the subject, it is argued that this approach renders being itself invisible. Therefore, the study proposes not only an ontological return but also a reconsideration of the possibility of contact with being. The “onto-conscience” approach developed in this context interprets conscience not as a subjective faculty, but as the manifestation of being within the human. Conscience is not a psychological experience; it is the mode in which being reveals itself. The “primacy of conscience,” on the other hand, refers to the dimension in which being becomes most directly visible. While this approach shows partial parallelism with Mulla Sadra’s ontology that defends the primacy of being, it expands it through an ethical and phenomenological perspective. The study comparatively examines the thoughts of Muhammad Iqbal and Martin Heidegger. It demonstrates that both thinkers strive to overcome Cartesian subjectivism and position the human not as the constitutive center of being but as a field of possibility in which being is disclosed. Iqbal’s understanding of “khudi” and Heidegger’s concept of “Dasein” offer a dynamic conception of being as an alternative to subject-centered thought [...]
References
Aristoteles. (2014). Nikomakhos’a etik (F. Akderin, Çev.). Say Yayınları.
Algra, K. (1994). Concepts of space in Greek thought. E.J. Brill.
Best, S., & Douglas. K. (1998). Postmodem teori (M. Küçük, Çev.). Ayrıntı Yay.
Buber, M. (1947). Between man and man (R. Gregor-Smith, Çev.). Routledge.
Çınar, A. (2025). Spinoza’da beden dolayımlaması üzerinden toplumsal cinsiyet, Feminist Teoloji içinde, Elis Yayınları.
Deniz, Ş. (2006). Öznelcilik ve eleştirisi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 219-230.
Eco, U. (2003) Yorum ve aşırı yorum (K. Atakay, Çev.). Can Yayınevi.
Huizinga, J. (2019). Ortaçağın sonbaharı (O. Düz, Çev.). Alfa Yayınları.
Heidegger, M. (2000). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Çev.). Blackwell Publishers.
Heidegger, M. (2001). Zaman ve varlık üzerine (D. Kanıt, Çev.). A Yayınevi.
Heidegger, M. (1997). Özdeşlik ve ayrım (N. Aça, Çev.). Bilim ve Sanat Yay.
İkbal, M. (2017) İslam’da dini düşüncenin yeniden inşası (R. Acar, Çev.). Timaş Yayınları.
MacIntyre, A. (2001). Varoluşçuluk (H. Hünler, Çev.). Paradigma Yay.
Morris, B. (1995) Anthropological studies of religion: An introductory text. Cambridge University Press.
Ross, W. D. (2011). Aristoteles (A. Arslan, Çev.). Kabalcı yayınları.
Kierkegaard, S. (1941). Kierkegaard’s concluding unscientific postscript (D. Swenson & W. Lowrie, Çev.). Princeton University Press.
Sanders, B. (2020). Öküzün A’sı (Ş. Tahir, Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Shayegan, D. (2013). Melez bilinç (H., Bayrı, Çev.). Metis Yayınları.
Sennett, R. (2002). Kamusal insanın çöküşü (S. Durak & A. Yılmaz). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Strauss, L. (2000). Politika felsefesi nedir? (S. Z. Hünler, Çev.). Paradigma Yayınları.
Tillich, P. (1963). Morality and beyond. Harper & Row.
Meçin, M. (2019). Molla Sadrâ’da zaman anlayışı ve tarih bilinci (Tez no. 613520) [Doktora Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi]. YÖK Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=4J_FzTwlrMCH4qBROpXPHzh-HF-1XYmhfnlNa-CR1kYVUq5SSMyaCXhmof5v7J2IX
Yazır, E. H. (1978). “Sesleniş (Hutbe)”, Paul Janet, Gabriel Séailles, Metâlib ve Mezâhib [Metafizik ve İlahiyat], (Orijinal Metin: Histoire de la Philosophie, Les Problémes et Les Écoles, 1886), Terc. Elmalılı Hamdi Yazır, Eser Neşriyat ve Dağıtım.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aliye Çınar (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work.
All content published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/